Mixers are common industrial devices that consist of a motor and a propeller or paddle with a coupling acting as the connection point. Mixers are flexible, adaptable pieces of equipment found in a range of industries, from food processing to mining to chemical facilities.
You will get efficient and thoughtful service from CNG.
Choosing the correct coupling for a mixer can be challenging as it needs to have an exact, rigid fit . This blog will highlight how to determine the right coupling for your mixer and how our configurator tool can help you configure your rigid coupling to your needs.
Unlike flexible couplings, a rigid coupling does not allow any radial or axial motion between the driving shaft and the driven unit. It is primarily used for vertical applications. Rigid coupling types include:
On mixers, the motor is bearing-supported, but the shaft on the impeller side is not. Using a flexible coupling would require close bearing support on the paddle, but the sleeve-like design of rigid couplings eliminates the need for a bearing to support the paddle. This makes rigid couplings the only viable option for mixers.
Rigid couplings have a simple and durable design, allowing greater transmission of power to mixers. They are more cost-effective than other options and offer more design flexibility. While requiring exact alignment between shafts, rigid couplings offer a stronger connection, higher torque, and more precision than flexible couplings.
Rigid couplings provide advantages, such as:
Choosing the best coupling for a mixer requires precision. Stafford Manufacturing’s configurator tool can help you customize a rigid coupling that suits your exact needs. Configure it by bore diameter, coupling style, coupling material, screw material, finish, and other options available upon request.
Contact us to discuss your requirements of Rigid Coupling Supplier. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.
Here are more details about the top considerations for choosing a rigid coupling for a mixer.
Bore diameter ranges from ¼” to 4”. Choosing the right diameter is key to ensuring a precise alignment.
Coupling styles include one-piece, two-piece, and three-piece. One-piece styles have high torque capacities, unlike set screw type couplings. Two-piece styles allow for easy assembly and adjustment. Three-piece styles are used to maintain one shaft’s positioning while the other is adjusted.
Material selection is based on the substance your coupling is exposed to. Coupling materials include brass, 303 and 304 stainless steel, weldable steel, carbon steel, and aluminum.
Consider these factors when deciding on the best coupling for your mixer:
Stafford’s rigid couplings meet these criteria as they are designed with end users’ needs in mind. Our rigid couplings come in different types, from the common one-piece split clamp coupling to precision sleeve couplings.
Are you interested in learning more about Flexible Grooved Coupling? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!
I have a contractor onsite that is installing couplings from a manufacturer with no UL listing & only the EC stamp. I would like them to submit to the AHJ for approval he says there is no need.Actually there is a need,
344.6 Listing Requirements.
RMC, factory elbows and couplings, and associated fittings shall be listed.
There is no UL or accepted NRTL on the box & the couplings possess an EC stamp. Upon writing an to the Mfg. Co., the reply was these items are "built to UL specs".
The EC is for "European commission" I believe the items are made in China.I'd say you have good reason to reject them based on 344.6
I'd say you have good reason to reject them based on 344.6
Roger
I'd say he's got evidence to reject them but good reason hasn't been proven yet.No, good reason has been proven per the article mentioned, is a really necessary, not IMO but it is the code. If you have time why not submit a proposal to remove the listing requirement for a future code cycle.
No, good reason has been proven per the article mentioned, is a really necessary, not IMO but it is the code. If you have time why not submit a proposal to remove the listing requirement for a future code cycle.
Roger
Haha good one. Seeing as how that wouldn't financially benefit anyone on the cmp I think I'll save myself the effort and complain about it hereSo, it will remain a code violation and enforceable.
So, it will remain a code violation and enforceable.
BTW, I would prefer to buy American made anyways.
Roger
This seems like it would require incredible attention to detail, on an item as insignificant as a conduit coupling, relative to the total scope of the project. How likely is it that an inspector would notice the difference on a conduit coupling, that is still built to the same specs as most UL listed conduit couplings?
Plus, it very well could be that when you install a UL listed coupling, that the UL marking is out of view by pure luck, and major surgery to rework for showing the marking. If the inspector challenges you on this, even when you did install a UL listed fitting, what is your best course of action?
If the inspector challenges you on this, even when you did install a UL listed fitting, what is your best course of action?
Show him the box they came in or an identical looking coupling with the mark visible?As GoldDigger says, the listing information will be on the packaging or the manufacturer can provide it, this is covered in the UL White Book.
There is no UL or accepted NRTL on the box & the couplings possess an EC stamp. Upon writing an to the Mfg. Co., the reply was these items are "built to UL specs".